- Just Smarty Interactive Alphabet Wall Chart, Pinkfong Baby Shark | Educational Toddler Musical Mat, ABC Poster, Room Decor, Activities & Games, Toddler Gift Set for Ages 1-3, Baby Shark Toys

An excellent educational product. Well made and easy for toddlers to use. Highly recommend!

This is so great for when I’m busy I don’t do tv or screens so this is great.

My son is very interested in the "game" he is starting to learn his letters, and enjoys saying it after the toy does. He also loves baby shark and enjoys the songs! Only issue is it has be very flat otherwise it will not work correctly when pressed.

My granddaughter loves this.She plays with it all the time.

It’s a good product, good concept, has Baby Shark, so it’s worth the price for me. There’s a few issues that I think are minor, but not enough to stop me from giving a 4 star review. Firstly, my kid enjoys it and I sit there and play with her, trying to teach her the alphabet on it. That’s the real strong point: it’s easy to play interactively with your kid using this toy. And the kid overall enjoys it. She likes the music option where she can play a few songs like Baby Shark and the ABC songs. This matters the most to be beyond the fact that it’s educational. My main issues are minor in relation to that and the price point. You do need to press a bit hard on the mat to get a response and sometimes, certain sounds are unclear in the built in speaker. For example, both my wife and I got several letters guesses wrong because the D and B and V sounds were not clear enough. Maybe I need to turn up the volume more, but I honestly don’t want obnoxiously loud toys just so I can hear the letter. It does need better quality speakers, but at this price point (I think it was like 23$ or 24$), I’m not expecting surround sound so it’s not for me what you’d call a “pain point” in buying. It’s acceptable for the price, it just could be better. If it made the difference of an extra 2-3$ for speaker quality, I’d be happy to pay it, though. Something I would change or improve, but it’s not exactly a complaint: I would maybe structure the letter and image finding game differently. Or maybe have more options for how it can be played, like different modes or difficulty settings. I do not think, that by itself, it provides enough associative value to the letters in terms of the finding the letter and image game. It does provide some uses and I’m not critiquing it since I don’t want to put it down beyond its intended design, but it would be better if the find the letter game then explained or connected somehow in a more clear way that the letter was connected phonetically to the pronunciation of the given image. Language, in how it confers meaning to phonetic contour (at least English), fundamentally operates as in a sound-image manner. Semiotics 101. This just asks the kid to find the letter or image and basically indicates they got it right. That is a useful thing, and for that I’m fine with it, but it’s a bit limited in that regard and I would have preferred to see that aspect of the game improved on. I’m using it to try and teach my 3 year old girl the alphabet more clearly in a way she can read. I think this would be best used supplementally when a kid is already learning to read through other means, like at school. For me, currently abroad in a non-English speaking country, it’s solely on me to teach my kid proper English and reading since nobody else does that at her age. It does have spelling options, which is useful, especially for multiple age groups, but this is a weak point, as well, for some. If you’re buying it to help teach a 3 year old how to tell a/b/c, the board will probably become obsolete by the time they’re at the age to use the spelling part. Kids just don’t maintain interest in spelling boards for long enough to go from knowing the alphabet to spelling a word as long as “necklace”. Even if Baby Shark is in it. So, it needs more functionality to cater to each age group, in my opinion. More modes and difficulties for each style of game would be an improvement in that regard. Otherwise, it’s not a toy to give to children for autopilot. At least not at 3. Or probably any age. You do need to engage with the kid for this to be useful, in my opinion. But, it is useful and a fair price. And it has Baby Shark. So, my kid enjoys it. I’m okay with that. And again, I would like to emphasize, it has used and you can teach your kid with this. Baby Shark is a very strong appeal to a kid and will help your kid get into the idea of reading a bit. That is very important and useful and even if the game were better designed, without that pull for the kid to engage it, good luck getting the kid to be interested at all! I recommend it, but it needs improvement fundamentally in a few areas. PS if R&D is reading this come holla!

If you've read my other reviews, you've probably seen that I've reviewed a LOT of Baby Shark merch. It's because my toddler loves Baby Shark more than /Bluey or Peppa Pig or anyone else in the world. So I'm always trolling Amazon for affordable Baby Shark stuff. Bonus for educational items! This interactive poster is perfect! Even though it says ages 1-3 and 2-4 (?) in the title, I wasn't sure if it was going to be too baby for my three year old. Luckily, it's perfect! She loves it so much. We put it on her bedroom door she whenever she walks by she interacts with it. It was easy enough to teach her how to turn it on and off. It actually has a variety of activities, more than just the Baby Shark song, which can get annoying to parents.

Got it for my daughter's birthday and she is absolutely obsessed with this baby shark poster. We hung it on her bedroom door , as soon as she wakes up, she runs to turn it on and dances and laughs. Thank you, it works great and so educational, she plays with it every day. Highly recommend this toy for toddlers especially those obsessed with Baby Shark.

Easy to used my daughter loves it

My 3 year old twins absolutely love this