MX-6 (4 g, incl. 6 MX Cleaner) - Ultimate Performance Thermal Paste for CPU, Consoles, Graphics Cards, laptops, Very high Thermal Conductivity, Long Durability, Non-Conductive

This thermal paste worked extremely well for repasting my laptop. Temperatures dropped noticeably almost immediately after applying it, and the fans don’t ramp up nearly as aggressively anymore under load. The laptop simply runs cooler and quieter overall now.Performance-wise, this paste definitely lives up to the reputation ARCTIC products have built over the years. It transfers heat very effectively and seems especially good for laptops, consoles, GPUs, and other devices where temperatures can get pretty high in compact spaces.The included cleaning wipes were also surprisingly useful. They did an excellent job removing the old dried thermal paste without needing much scrubbing. The wipes do have a pretty strong chemical smell though, so using them in a ventilated area is definitely a good idea.One thing worth mentioning is the consistency. MX-6 is thicker than a lot of older thermal pastes, so it’s not the easiest paste to manually spread with a card or spatula. Using a pea or X-pattern application works much better because the pressure from the cooler spreads it evenly on its own. Once compressed, coverage is excellent.The 4g tube also goes farther than expected. Even after repasting a laptop, there’s still plenty left for future applications on CPUs, GPUs, or consoles, so the value for money is very good.Another big plus is that it’s non-conductive, which makes the application process less stressful since there’s much lower risk if a little extra paste spreads near components.Overall, this is an excellent thermal paste with strong cooling performance, long durability, good value, effective cleaning wipes, and noticeably lower temperatures and fan noise after installation. Definitely a worthwhile upgrade for older laptops, gaming consoles, or desktop PCs running hot.

My 6 year old aging laptop started to run the fan constantly. I opened it up, dusted out the fan, and used this thermal paste when reassembling. The wipes worked fine, although they had a strong lemon odor. It was more pleasant than pure alcohol smell initially, but it made me worried that there would be fragrance residue left behind instead of a purely clean surface on my processor board. Still, when reassembled, the fan now comes on much less frequently and everything works as new.

Works great for both the liquid cooler for my CPU and the heatsink on the graphics card

Works very well and met my expectations. I needed it for an older Cisco Switch that is fanless. I needed to redo the paste. The cleaning solution works fantastic, BUT keep IN MIND, it is fairly strong smell. Does a fantastic job though.If you need to depend on something, this is the solution. I have been in IT / IS since the early 8086-2 days.

Used it on my CPU and it seems to work very well. Temps stay low while using cheap oem cooler

I've known about Arctic for awhile but only recently became a customer after purchasing a tube of MX-5 and then a P12 fan, shortly after. My experience of applying another company’s paste on an install is limited to only a couple of other brands as thermal paste application isn't exactly one of my pastimes, so I'm going to compare & contrast this w/ MX-5, which this is not only the successor of but also the replacement. This review will also discuss what seems to be the consensus "best" paste by overclocking enthusiasts, YouTubers, and "influencers", etc. A product which despite its YUGE following and noteworthy sponsorship, has a FAR too little discussed caveat (a dealbreaker, IMHO, which has significant implications for the IHS/die it's been applied on, and even includes the potential for post-install 'maintenance'). Also, I don’t have any info in regards to performance data (CPU upgrade so unfortunately no baseline), so if you're looking for metrics, you'll have to look elsewhere (Tom's Hardware is a good start). If you'd like to go straight to the review, then skip the following paragraph.After researching way too many thermal paste comparison tests, MX-5 was at or near the top of just about every single one it was included in and for those that it wasn't (due to being too new), MX-4 consistently ranked as one of the better pastes but when taking into account its age, durability, value and how much newer the products it was competing against were, MX-4 was a solid competitor and offered a compelling package at an affordable price. A couple of contenders at the top included Thermal Grizzly's Kryonaut, and the two offerings from Noctua (H1/H2). Personally, the main appeal to Arctic's formulas for me was its longevity, which they claim lasts as long as 8 years, with the only option coming close to approaching that long being Noctua. Even then, (while still impressive) they could only reach 5 years. It's no coincidence these two belong to what I consider to be the top three cooling companies in the industry, IMO. The third is Scythe (in no chronological order), a Japanese company known for making EXCELLENT heatsinks and tremendous case fans, and whose Fuma 2 happens to be the cooler I chose in this case (no pun intended), which sat on top of these pastes in my build. While I am def not gonna pay Thermal Grizzly's ridiculous prices ($10/gram for an application, maybe 2 if conservative) out of priniciple, most importantly was for every 5 star review of Kryonaut (including its appropriately named "EXTREME" version) by someone claiming they achieved their lowest recorded temps with it, there would be a few 1-2 star reviews complaining about it drying out, and even turning hard after removing the heatsink. What was most concerning tho, was the fact that this was happening in under a year, usually within months. Their own product page states "Kryonaut uses a special structure, which halts the drying out process at temperatures of up to 80° Celsius", while also mentioning "that this thermal grease was created especially for cryogenic applications." So yeah, even tho they admit this crucial detail themselves, to say that this is a frequently overlooked aspect (judging by the consistent surprise in negative reviews, yet still seeing it recommended by others all too frequently) would be putting it kindly. I don't mind paying a few extra bucks for a quality product as evidenced by MX-6's price increase, particularly compared to MX-4 (at launch this was $10 for the 4g tube of MX-6 + 5 wipes), but there is certainly a limit, and ESPECIALLY so if the product has to be replaced at least ONCE a YEAR. Ain't nobody got time for that.While I can unequivocally say that this is better than MX-5, that is a pathetically low bar and hurdle to pass, one that is more indicative of its predecessor’s failures than anything else. I’ve already mentioned why I’m unable to measure performance, but what I CAN compare are the physical characteristics, especially as it pertains to MX-5, and to a lesser degree MX-4. This MX-6 seems almost like a hybrid of MX-5 and MX-4, but leaning significantly more towards the former. It's still very sticky, just not AS sticky, which helps with the application. MX-4 was much more akin to a normal paste, smooth and easy to move around. This is a THICK paste, substantially thicker than its predecessors, but still stringy enough to spread around unlike MX-5, yet not nearly as easy as MX-4 (but at least still doable, and can be achieved with some time). It’s hard to gauge MX-5 because it’s simultaneously viscous and watery, which I believe is due to the separation (and reason for its recall) if not entirely then at least partially, which made it weird to spread and resistant to emulsify. Spreading it with the spatula was almost like dipping a recently used paintbrush in water, then attempting to paint a clean surface with it. Or, like using a basting brush (aka pastry brush, TIL), the ones that come with BBQ sauce in those gift sets, to glaze meat but w/ barely any sauce left. And that’s if you’re even able to spread at all (it’s somewhat doable, depending on your experience ofc, but you’ll def need a tool like a spatula or credit card and a lot of patience, along w/ time). Another difference is the color. MX-4 is the typical gray, while MX-5 was like a light, almost turquoise blue. MX-6 returns back to the (more pleasant if not dull) gray, a welcome change IMO. Something I noticed and thought was interesting is that Arctic advertises this by stating it has 20% better performance than MX-4, although this could be simply due to MX-5 no longer being in production means the former is the closest product in their lineup to compare with. One aspect different from its predecessors is that it does NOT come with the spreading spatula for some reason.Due to the chiplet design of Ryzen on AM4, I used that tool to spread a very thin layer, referred to as the "spread method", predominantly around the edges of the IHS. Then, I use a miniaturized version of the "X" method, that doesn't go all the way to the edges. Another way to achieve a similar result (either in conjunction with or instead of) is to simply blot the corners on the X with a dot, as thick as necessary (for Ryzen on AM4, slightly thicker than the line). Finally, I place a decent sized blob (aka the pea method) in the center. I have no scientific knowledge or verifiable proof that this works best, and you could remove one (if not two) of the three options and still obtain good coverage. Everyone has their own little quirks, routines, opinions and even philosophies on thermal paste, but due to the processor design I find this is what works for me and after taking off the heatsink, all of my previous applications have had complete coverage. AMD actually recommends a pentadot, which helped form the basis of mine after seeing how it provided decent outer coverage. If it were an Intel (Alder/Raptor Lake) or even a Threadripper, I'd prolly just use the X method due to the rectangular shape and call it a day. Actually, a technique comparable to what I mentioned a few lines above that could really be beneficial for Intel's processors in particular, is in addition to the "X", place a dot in the center of each side where huge gaps of empty space remain (esp on the longer sides) due to its square shape. It's kinda hard to explain via text but think of it as placing a dot at the end of each line of a "+" sign, and what you're left with (including the existing "X") almost looks like a symmetrical "*". Does that makes sense? I hope it does. Anyway, most people seem to prefer and recommend the pea method by itself which is fine too. Whatever floats your boat, or tickles your fancy.Back to the MX-5, which was like straight up glue, even during application, and ESPECIALLY AFTER. During the install, it didn't take long for me to realize that what I feared most wasn't getting it on: rather, it was getting the paste OFF. I ran stress (torture) tests, specifically Prime95 until my processor reached 95C and stayed there for about 30 minutes before shutting down and then was very careful removing the cooler, making sure to twist it side to side while pulling. Yet despite all that, it still took the CPU off with it, so after removing the cooler, I was still unable to separate the CPU using anything, including dental floss (both Glide and regular), eventually warming it with a hair dryer for about five minutes or so (a heat gun should obv work, just be careful w/ the distance at very high temperatures and constantly move it around). I gave it another try w/ the regular floss and finally, I was able to remove the CPU w/o any bent pins.While I'm mentioning all this in case anyone else reading this used glue (aka MX-5) or is stuck in a similar situation, it's also for those considering the wipes for this purchase. So if you’re contemplating wondering whether you should purchase 5 of them for about a buck (esp if worried about stuck thermal paste glued onto your cooler), then it likely — although not necessarily — means you have a use for it, and so if this is true, then my answer would be an emphatic YES! They're pretty large and good sized once removed from packaging, have plenty of liquid that won't immediately dry out so you have a few minutes, and each one goes a long way. Just be warned they have a weird and pugent smell. Personally, something as minor as that is never a reason for me to avoid a product if it performs better than a non-smelling product, but I keep seeing this mentioned in reviews and even being a dealbreaker, so thought it should be noted. A single wipe goes a long way, which is why I believe that if you have a need for it, it's worth purchasing due to the value provided for a single dollar and some change.Anyway, if you made it all the way here to the end, then I hope this was helpful. Good luck on your install.Cheers

Great product, easy to use. I used this to fix the cold water sensor for my primo water cooler. It use to freeze over and become unusable. Now, after removing the sensor and applying the thermo paste to sensor, no issues.

Good thermal paste, as to be expected from the brand - but holy hell, that cleaner STINKS. Take the chip / cooler outside, wipe them down, throw the cleaner towel into a bag, and walk it out to your bin.

Disipa bien y tiene buena cantidadSe lo puse a varios dispositivos, laptop, xbox, ssd y mejora la transferencia de calor al disipador así que evitó que mis equipos se dañaran al usarlos

parfait

Recensione:La ARCTIC MX‑6 è una pasta termica di fascia alta, ideale per CPU, GPU, console e notebook.Rispetto alla MX‑4 offre prestazioni termiche superiori (fino al 20% in più), con una consistenza facile da stendere e non serve un tempo di assestamento dopo l’applicazione.È sicura perché non conduce elettricità e mantiene le prestazioni per anni senza seccarsi.Il formato da 4 g è sufficiente per più applicazioni (io stimo 5-6 applicazioni) e i 6 panni MX Cleaner inclusi sono un plus: rimuovono in pochi secondi la vecchia pasta senza lasciare residui e hanno un profumo fantastico che rimarra nella stanza per giorni 😋. Nei miei test ho visto temperature più basse di 1‑3°C rispetto a paste di fascia media, soprattutto sotto carico prolungato.In sintesi: facile da applicare, prestazioni elevate, kit completo. Perfetta sia per chi fa manutenzione saltuaria sia per chi assembla o aggiorna spesso i propri sistemi.

Good thermal paste The best on the market quality price Good added cleaning papers.

Bardzo dobry ma chłodne na procesorem jak norma poziom w temperaturze :)