TP-LinkOmada SG2005P-PD | 5 Port Outdoor PoE Passthrough Gigabit Ethernet Switch | 1 PoE++ in@90W, 4 PoE+ Out Up to 64W | IP55, Static Routing, Access Control List, QoS, VLAN | PoE Powered ONLY

A solid performing switch and it can be managed remotely through Omada. I have this mounted in the rafters of my garage using the included bracket. It powers and AP and a couple of hardwired devices. The included POE injector is a little anemic but it works for my use case. It works as advertised and I’m happy with it.

Needed a switch for my patio that could handle being exposed to the elements and didn’t need an electric socket near by. This fits the bill perfectly and since I’m already heavily invested in the Omada ecosystem, it fits in perfectly. My only wish is that they would just bump the price up a bit and chuck a POE++ injector in the box. I had to buy one separately since my switch doesn’t support POE++ and all my spare injectors are POE+. Anywho, this thing appears to work perfectly. It was painless for my Omada controller to adopt it and update the firmware. This is a very nice little switch. For my uses this will power two POE cameras, a POE access point and will provide a wired data connection to an outdoor smart TV.

This outdoor switch is incompatible with the other outdoor Omada products. The other outdoor Omada products (including EAP225 and EAP215) are Passive POE devices which are apparently incompatible with this outdoor switch. So despite having a POE switch outdoors, I still have to use POE injectors on all of the outdoor APs.

Needed a poe powered switch that also could power 4 pi4's all from a single poe+ upstream port. On top of that, I wanted integration with the rest of my Omada network. This one actually fit the bill perfectly! I have no use for the outdoor/weather proof aspect of it and wish they had a desktop version. But I can deal with that part. The switch and 4 pi4's pull a total of 16.4W from my poe+ switch. each pi is using 2~3 W so the switch itself is only pulling 4~5W. A little on the pricier side, when a standard 8 port is $15 cheaper, but those don't do POE out, so that is worth a bit more. can't complain as there isn't anything else in the Omada line that does what this one does. And it's exactly what I need!Low power!POE powered!POE output on 4 portsManaged switch!Omada integration!perfect for what I needed it to be!

No complaints, works as expected. One thing to note is that it does not fully work with Ubiquiti POE injectors. This is an issue with Ubiquiti, not TP-Link. Ubiquiti injectors apparently do not conform to proper power negotiating standards. It will power on, but not negotiate more power beyond 15 watts

Great little switch, works well for both indoor and outdoor environments. It has PoE passthrough which means it's both powered by PoE in and can also provide PoE to downstream devices. I've got one in my garage and the fact that it's PoE powered meant that I didn't have to run new electrical wiring for it (it's in a location that doesn't have any power outlets).I've got two security cameras plugged in to it, both powered by PoE, and it's working well. Total power usage for my use case is a little less than 10W total. The switch itself is using around 4W. I've also got one non-PoE device plugged in to it.It supports management with an Omada Controller, or you can manage it standalone by going to its IP address in a web browser.

I bought this because it supports both VLANs and PoE pass-through. I'm powering this using PoE from another room in the house and this, in turn, powers three Unifi access points using PoE without any problems. I need VLAN segmentation, which this version supports.This switch can be managed centrally using their software, but I chose to instead manage it from its built-in web interface. I was pleasantly surprised by both the number of features exposed as well as the ease of configuring these; it was all very intuitive (if you're familiar with VLANs, in general). I'm also happy to report that it can be configured to route both IPv4 and IPv6.The case itself is also pretty good for an outdoor installation as it has protection that goes over the Ethernet ports, though I chose to install mine inside. I would have gone with an 'indoor' version of this if I could find one with the same capabilities for around the same price.

Since the products are combined on one product page this is two reviews.First, for the outdoor unit:1. This does not have any way to power itself. That means your need to find an outdoor powering solution... which defeats the point of buying this for its outdoor feature in the first place in most scenarios.2. Its overpriced. There are a few outdoor poe switch options on amazon that cost less and actually do come with power. So half the work required and you didn't pay as much.3. The holes for the ethernet to go through aren't exactly waterproof. And they're also not lined up with the ethernet ports, which means there will be a severe bend between the switch and the cover. With the bend, a larger ethernet cable cant really make the bend. With my thicker ethernet cables I have to leave the cover off which means it's not much different than a non outdoor unit.4. Also, be sure to note you CANNOT use a passive Poe injector to power this. You have to buy a $75 poe injector to get this working. And then you have to find a way to make that injector usable outdoors. In my setup that was another $50 outdoor box... at which point, why not just put a non outdoor switch in the box instead?Second, the desktop switch lasted about 6 months. The previous one I had was about the same.I want to love tp-link because I use their business stuff, but the truth is, the products are just average.